I triple checked the arithmetics-these numbers are irrefutable.

Mathematical proof that Darwin didn't exist

thank you palelittlething for the find =D


  • Jeffy

    I’m not even mad, I’m impressed!

  • Jeffy

    I’m not even mad, I’m impressed!

  • Derek

    Evolution doesn’t mean we came from monkey’s, but that we share a common ancestor with monkeys and other primates that existed long, long (millions of years) ago. Your math might be right, but your knowledge of how evolution works is way off. Nice try dumbass.

    • I don’t know… you have a valid point but do you have arithmetic to back it up? I didn’t think so.

      Show me 3650 monkie births and I’ll start believing in evolution. Its science.

      • TEvo

        No, he’s right, monkeys cannot give birth to humans, ever, under any circumstances, and this is not what evolution argues. Once again, evolution says that we share a common ancestor with apes about 5-7 million years ago. And yes, we do have the math to back it up, we can measure what species are evolving, in which genes, and at what rate. Its called teh Hardy-Weinberg equation. This is a good start http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution. Of course, you may hae trouble with this one if you cannot spell monkey.

        • YOU ARE PROVING THE VERY POINTE! MONKIE CANNOT GIVE BIRTH, yet it should.??

          I do not need your fancy writings. This is all comma sence.

          • TEvo

            No, it shouldn’t that is just not what evolution is. Evolution is only common sense if you have some level of nuance in your understanding of the natural sciences (judging from your choice not to consult a spell-check program, I would conclude that you are not one to push yourself toward a greater understanding of our universe).

            You cannot try to create a rational argument against something if you refuse to learn what it is. Allow me to submit to you my equivalent argument against Christianity based on the very logic that you used (a fundamental misunderstanding of the concept):

            I do not believe in the Bible because according to the Bible and the word of Jesus clearly state that true believers will be 9-10 feet tall and eat their own children. Of the world’s 1 billion or more Christians I ask you to find me a significant number of Christians, say, 500 million, who eat their own children. You see, the numbers just don’t add up!

          • yet another good pointe! I know at least 470 millian Christians who eat their young in my own personal life, which leads me to believe that there exist at least 30 more millian somewhere else out there. Your bible theory holds. You should consider getting it published?

          • TEvo

            I hope i’ve satisfied the troll’s hunger.

          • UrAWinrar

            It’s like trolling in a sea of trolls!

          • will

            Good reply man!

          • nem

            It’s funny… These people are on a Troll website and think people are being serious.

          • nemisastupidcow

            nem, you’re a fucking moron.

    • /b/rother

      Wow, you have to be pretty dumb to get trolled by a post in a website called “Help Feed The Troll,” yet somehow you managed it, good job, keep it up.

  • Derek

    Evolution doesn’t mean we came from monkey’s, but that we share a common ancestor with monkeys and other primates that existed long, long (millions of years) ago. Your math might be right, but your knowledge of how evolution works is way off. Nice try dumbass.

    • I don’t know… you have a valid point but do you have arithmetic to back it up? I didn’t think so.

      Show me 3650 monkie births and I’ll start believing in evolution. Its science.

      • TEvo

        No, he’s right, monkeys cannot give birth to humans, ever, under any circumstances, and this is not what evolution argues. Once again, evolution says that we share a common ancestor with apes about 5-7 million years ago. And yes, we do have the math to back it up, we can measure what species are evolving, in which genes, and at what rate. Its called teh Hardy-Weinberg equation. This is a good start http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution. Of course, you may hae trouble with this one if you cannot spell monkey.

        • YOU ARE PROVING THE VERY POINTE! MONKIE CANNOT GIVE BIRTH, yet it should.??

          I do not need your fancy writings. This is all comma sence.

          • TEvo

            No, it shouldn’t that is just not what evolution is. Evolution is only common sense if you have some level of nuance in your understanding of the natural sciences (judging from your choice not to consult a spell-check program, I would conclude that you are not one to push yourself toward a greater understanding of our universe).

            You cannot try to create a rational argument against something if you refuse to learn what it is. Allow me to submit to you my equivalent argument against Christianity based on the very logic that you used (a fundamental misunderstanding of the concept):

            I do not believe in the Bible because according to the Bible and the word of Jesus clearly state that true believers will be 9-10 feet tall and eat their own children. Of the world’s 1 billion or more Christians I ask you to find me a significant number of Christians, say, 500 million, who eat their own children. You see, the numbers just don’t add up!

  • MIKEY

    MY UNCEL SAID HE SAW A MONKEY GIVE BIRHT TO A BABY HUUMAN BUT IT IS A CONSPIRECY AND THEY DON WONT YOU TO NOOW.

    • Will

      whose side are you on? Because that doesn’t fit with either!

  • MIKEY

    MY UNCEL SAID HE SAW A MONKEY GIVE BIRHT TO A BABY HUUMAN BUT IT IS A CONSPIRECY AND THEY DON WONT YOU TO NOOW.

  • Concerned Darwinist

    What is this I don’t even… I can’t even comprehend the line of thinking that lead this person to think that evolution works this way.

    • FeepingCreature

      “On two occasions I have been asked, ‘Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?’ I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ”

      –Charles Babbage

  • Concerned Darwinist

    What is this I don’t even… I can’t even comprehend the line of thinking that lead this person to think that evolution works this way.

    • FeepingCreature

      “On two occasions I have been asked, ‘Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?’ I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. ”

      –Charles Babbage

  • is this for real?

    Are you just an idiot or stupid

    • i think you might be the idiot if you can seriously deny the proof that the person provided?

      • lol

        lol. pure genius

  • is this for real?

    Are you just an idiot or stupid

    • i think you might be the idiot if you can seriously deny the proof that the person provided?

  • Marcus Fischer

    Your arithmetic is indeed irrefutable, but you did not use the formulas that the theory supports, you basically just invented your own (wrong) theory of evolution and tested it and found it to be false.

    • kbird

      marcus?

      -bird

  • Marcus Fischer

    Your arithmetic is indeed irrefutable, but you did not use the formulas that the theory supports, you basically just invented your own (wrong) theory of evolution and tested it and found it to be false.

    • kbird

      marcus?

      -bird

  • Brian Oblivion

    When I was a much younger man, I gave birth to 3650 monkey’s at once. It’s not so much technical science stuff as it is technique.

    • pure genius

      …pure….genius….

  • Brian Oblivion

    When I was a much younger man, I gave birth to 3650 monkey’s at once. It’s not so much technical science stuff as it is technique.

  • Someguy

    I tihnk Darwin is a cool guy, he maeks peole into monkyes adn doesnt afraid of anything.

  • Someguy

    I tihnk Darwin is a cool guy, he maeks peole into monkyes adn doesnt afraid of anything.

  • lmfaoallthewayhome

    look in africa

  • lmfaoallthewayhome

    look in africa

  • lmfaoallthewayhome

    look in africa

  • Prototype (Alex Mercer)

    This is not monkey science. For the proof, all we need is the picture of Tiger Woods, everybody knows that he’s half Chimpanzee half Flying Monkey. So if we can have such an incredibly talented monkey as a sport celebrity, there are many more. I heard Brad Pitt is in the group called the 12 MonKeys, and admits that he’s one.

  • Prototype (Alex Mercer)

    This is not monkey science. For the proof, all we need is the picture of Tiger Woods, everybody knows that he’s half Chimpanzee half Flying Monkey. So if we can have such an incredibly talented monkey as a sport celebrity, there are many more. I heard Brad Pitt is in the group called the 12 MonKeys, and admits that he’s one.

  • LolWhat

    This is priceless. To think someone could think evolution works on a nine month (or so) pregnancy scale. You have to love trolls for being entertaining. But damn! are they stupid, or what?

  • hmlrhotheta@hotmail.com

    Who can make a blind person see? Who can open up a closed mind when the bearer choses to keep it close? Evolution is a process which shaped up over a period of billions of years. This fool turns the process into a joke by formulating iwith monkey business analalogies. He/she is so bold as to try trivialize the process monkey equations. Small wonder religious orthodoxic thinking has lost grounds among the intellectuals and the educated. These people behave like retards. To the fool who wrote this, I say: “First you have to understand EVOLUTION before you even attempt to debunk the underlying theory behind it, you shameless fool.”

    • lol @ using email address as handle

  • Poopie

    ……………………………………..________
    ………………………………,.-‘”……………….“~.,
    ………………………..,.-”……………………………..“-.,
    …………………….,/………………………………………..”:,
    …………………,?………………………………………………,
    ………………./…………………………………………………..,}
    ……………../………………………………………………,:`^`..}
    ……………/……………………………………………,:”………/
    …………..?…..__…………………………………..:`………../
    …………./__.(…..“~-,_…………………………,:`………./
    ………../(_….”~,_……..“~,_………………..,:`…….._/
    ……….{.._$;_……”=,_…….“-,_…….,.-~-,},.~”;/….}
    ………..((…..*~_…….”=-._……“;,,./`…./”…………../
    …,,,___.`~,……“~.,………………..`…..}…………../
    …………(….`=-,,…….`……………………(……;_,,-”
    …………/.`~,……`-………………………………./
    ………….`~.*-,……………………………….|,./…..,__
    ,,_……….}.>-._……………………………..|…………..`=~-,
    …..`=~-,__……`,……………………………
    ……………….`=~-,,.,………………………….
    …………………………..`:,,………………………`…………..__
    ……………………………….`=-,……………….,%`>–==“
    …………………………………._……….._,-%…….`
    ……………………………..,<`.._|_,-&“…………….`

  • TheFirstLady

    OMG!!!!!!!!……..Wait……Let Me Guess……..Don’t tell Me……OMG!!!…..It’s On The Tip of My Tongue!!!…..Hold Your Horses……It’s, It’s OMG, It’s ***Sarah Palin***….. Hey EveryBody!!! ……….It’s ***Sarah F-Ing Palin!!!!………I Just Knew I Would Figure Out Where You Get All Your Ideas And Answers, And All That “Stuff” From…….I Sure Did!!!!!!…….I’m Speechless……..I Tell You, I’m In Awe!!!!!! You BETCHA!!!!!!

  • Karina

    this is the funniest thing I have ever read… there’s no way this person is serious. I think they’re pulling our chain. If they are… they’ve obviously no understanding of what is accepted as Darwinian evolution. Darwin definitely did not believe a monkey could give birth to a human. Also… saying that the chances of evolution being true are 50% just because there either 1)was evolution or 2) was not is like saying that the chances of rolling a 1 on a dice is 50% since it is either 1 or it is not. I claim like 12 fallacies in this.

    • Jeff colangelo

      we should go out

  • Chery

    lol@this discushion^

    • Will

      I don’t LOL as the discussion ideally should have no reason to exist – it’s a concern that people think that!

  • eddytheintelectual

    oh yeah, and an invisible man in the sky made us with magic is way more logical.

  • buzzorilla

    hey fuckos evolution is not monkeys givin birth to man, its about improvement via generations, see if you put a couple o’ hundred monkeys with a couple o hundred men after say 5 generation monkeys would begin to think they are men too, understood?

    now don’t say men would begin to think they are monkeys ok? we know for a fact that we men are better than those lousy monkeys.

  • MyNameisEggo

    The spelling flaws in this thread just go to prove that people quite possibly can give birth to –>monkeys<–.

    Now I don't believe in evolution at all, and I happen to be a Christian. But hey, if you refuse to believe what I do, I'm not going to force my beliefs on you. But back to my point.

    Before you start a rather large intellectual debate on mathematics and science… you should probably study a dictionary.

    And another thing. No creation theory is "logical". Because we are human and have to base everything we know on the laws of science (energy and matter cannot be created, nor can it be destroyed), neither the big bang theory, or the divine creator come off as "logical".

    • I can’t think of a name

      Well…… Technically you could say there were logical. If you take into account multiple universes then as one universe collapses another is created which solves the problem of energy/matter being created, it just came from somewhere else. And if you assume there is a god, then this god created the universe and has every right to defy the laws of physics…. 🙂 Lol, I know what you mean though 😛

      • Nazi_Buddhist_GoD

        lol the thoery there means that god is jsut a HUGE amount of Energy/Matter that split with itself and created everything….. which means worms are more like god then us because they can also split with themselves to make mroe worms.

    • Guest

      I would ‘like’ your post if you hadn’t mentioned you were christian :(.. fools who believe in bedtime stories imo.

    • Guest

      I would ‘like’ your post if you hadn’t mentioned you were christian :(.. fools who believe in bedtime stories imo.

    • Guest

      I would ‘like’ your post if you hadn’t mentioned you were christian :(.. fools who believe in bedtime stories imo.

  • You are wrong!

    Alright, if we take the properties of religion vs no religion, its 1:1 odds, or 50% chance.

    So, if religion is true, we’d expect to see all humans being born from god.

    Now, we know that approximately 216,000 babies are born each day. If each babie is in god’s womb for about 9 months, that’s approximately 58,320,000 babies in god’s womb at any given point in time.

    And yet, all we see is babies coming out of women.

    So, what we expected to be in god’s womb, only happens in women. And common sense tells us that man is created in the image of god, and women in the image of mans rib cage, so god must have a penis, and no womb.

    I challenge any christian here to find me a legitimate, non-photo-shopped picture of god’s womb with one babie in it. Let alone 58,320,000 of them.

    • Totheground

      chyeah!

  • windycity111

    someone needs to draw straws and fuck a monkey, get it preggers and, and show the baby to the teabagger party so theyll shut the fuck up

    • Titsallynotatroll

      Someone already tried this. The result was HIV and the teabagger party is still denying the child was human…

  • Cody

    So 3650 * 2 = 7300 not 7500…

  • Mrs. ThePoint

    Guys, how can you all have missed it?! This here is irrefutable proof that we’re really descendants of aliens!!!

  • Koba Khitalishvili

    Charles Darwin never said that humans came from monkeys.